# H.J.Res. 130 (119th): A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".

## How this bill is scored

Tier: no Tier 1 record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Lane: climate_policy. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: energy_policy. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: environmental_review. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: land_management. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: oversight. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Tier 1 sign-off: no record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Stored polarity: mixed. Only tags the rules mark scoreable on a mixed bill are scored. A yea can draw a penalty or a credit according to the tag. A nay on a tag scored as good can draw a penalty.
Roll 294: On Passage. Vote type: final_passage.
Roll 623: On the Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 130. Vote type: final_passage.
Polarity rationale: Reviewed enrichment (llm_import) polarity: The rule removes coal leasing from a planning area, and the resolution would restore it. Both sides involve real goods: energy and economic provision on one side, and environmental stewardship and compliance with a court-ordered NEPA evaluation on the other. Neither side directly advances a named moral evil, so this is a prudential dispute best classified as mixed.
Theological note: The measure bears on stewardship of creation, the responsible use of resources for human provision, and the weighing of energy needs against environmental and climate concerns. Scripture supports both careful dominion over the earth and prudent care for it, so the issue is a matter of prudential judgment about land use and energy policy rather than a direct moral evil. This is a framing of issue relevance, not a final candidate judgment.

## Recorded votes

Roll 294: On Passage. Yea 214 · Nay 212 · Other 7.
Roll 623: On the Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 130. Yea 51 · Nay 43 · Other 6.

HTML: https://justmeasure.org/bill/hjres-130-119/