# H.Res. 1175 (119th): This resolution provides for the consideration of the bill (H.R

This resolution provides for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 8035) to amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 through October 20, 2027, and for other purposes.

## How this bill is scored

Tier: no Tier 1 record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Lane: fisa_702. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: foreign_intelligence. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: government_overreach. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: surveillance. Category: liberty_conscience. Lane tag: general equity.
Tier 1 sign-off: no record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Stored polarity: evil. A yea is the penalized direction. A nay is the credited direction when the tag has a credit rule.
Roll 122: On Ordering the Previous Question. Vote type: procedural.
Roll 123: On Agreeing to the Amendment. Vote type: amendment.
Roll 124: On Agreeing to the Resolution. Vote type: final_passage.
Polarity rationale: Reviewed enrichment (llm_import) polarity: The resolution's operative purpose is to bring up a bill that extends the duration of FISA Section 702 surveillance authorities. Extending a government surveillance power directly advances a recognized form of intrusive state monitoring, and the metadata gives no indication of added warrant requirements or other binding limits on that power. Under the framework, direct advancement of surveillance power weighs toward evil, though the rule text alone does not establish the full operative content of H.R. 8035, so confidence is moderate.
Theological note: The measure bears on the proper limits of civil authority. Scripture grants government a real but bounded role in restraining evil (Romans 13:1-4), and general equity requires that state power be exercised with justice and protection of persons from unwarranted intrusion. Extending broad intelligence-collection authority raises the question of whether ordinary citizens are adequately shielded from unchecked government monitoring. The procedural resolution itself is not the substantive policy, so this is a matter of issue relevance rather than a final candidate judgment.

## Recorded votes

Roll 122: On Ordering the Previous Question. Yea 211 · Nay 210 · Other 10.
Roll 123: On Agreeing to the Amendment. Yea 200 · Nay 220 · Other 11.
Roll 124: On Agreeing to the Resolution. Yea 197 · Nay 228 · Other 6.

HTML: https://justmeasure.org/bill/hres-1175-119/