# H.Res. 580 (119th): Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R

Providing for consideration of the bills (H.R. 4016) Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026; (H.R. 3633) CLARITY Act; (H.R. 1919) Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act; and (S. 1582) GENIUS Act

## How this bill is scored

Tier: no Tier 1 record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Lane: abuse_coverup. Category: justice_truth. Lane tag: general equity.
Lane: anti_cbdc. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: appropriations. Category: corruption_stewardship. Lane tag: general equity.
Lane: defense_spending. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: digital_assets. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: financial_surveillance. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: surveillance. Category: liberty_conscience. Lane tag: general equity.
Lane: war_funding. Category: war_peace. Lane tag: prudential.
Tier 1 sign-off: no record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Stored polarity: mixed. Only tags the rules mark scoreable on a mixed bill are scored. A yea can draw a penalty or a credit according to the tag. A nay on a tag scored as good can draw a penalty.
Roll 194: On Ordering the Previous Question. Vote type: procedural.
Roll 195: On Agreeing to the Resolution. Vote type: final_passage.
Roll 198: On Agreeing to the Resolution. Vote type: final_passage.
Roll 197: On Motion to Reconsider. Vote type: procedural.
Polarity rationale: Reviewed enrichment (llm_import) polarity: The rule is procedural, but it bundles defense appropriations (war funding and debt spending concerns) with bills that may restrain state financial surveillance (the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act) and ordinary digital-asset market regulation. Ordinary appropriations and financial regulation are prudential goods, while the war-funding dimension and the unclear operative text of the other bills supply real concerns. This is a mixed classification, not direct advancement of a named moral evil by the rule itself.
Theological note: This rule raises issues of just stewardship of the sword, since defense appropriations bear on whether the state's military power is ordered toward legitimate defense and not unjust war. It also touches public money and debt, and the anti-CBDC bill bears on restraining coercive state financial monitoring. These are issues for prudential judgment under general equity, not a final moral verdict on the rule.

## Recorded votes

Roll 194: On Ordering the Previous Question. Yea 211 · Nay 210 · Other 11.
Roll 195: On Agreeing to the Resolution. Yea 196 · Nay 223 · Other 13.
Roll 198: On Agreeing to the Resolution. Yea 217 · Nay 212 · Other 3.
Roll 197: On Motion to Reconsider. Yea 215 · Nay 211 · Other 6.

HTML: https://justmeasure.org/bill/hres-580-119/