# H.Res. 93 (119th): This resolution provides for consideration of H.R

This resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 27, the Halt All Lethal Trafficking of Fentanyl Act or the HALT Fentanyl Act. Specifically, it waives all points of order against consideration of the bill. Under the resolution, the bill is to be considered as amended according to changes by the Rules Committee in its report accompanying the resolution.

## How this bill is scored

Tier: no Tier 1 record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Lane: abuse_accountability. Category: justice_truth. Lane tag: general equity.
Lane: criminal_justice. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: drug_trafficking_enforcement. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: procedural_rule. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Tier 1 sign-off: no record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Stored polarity: good. A yea supports the bill. A nay is the penalized direction when the tag is scored as a protection. A yea on a credit tag is a credit.
Roll 30: On Ordering the Previous Question. Vote type: procedural.
Roll 31: On Agreeing to the Resolution. Vote type: final_passage.
Polarity rationale: Reviewed enrichment (llm_import) polarity: The underlying bill, as described by its title, aims to restrain trafficking in a lethal substance, which falls under defending public justice and protecting life. The resolution only waives points of order and sets consideration terms, so its moral weight is derivative of H.R. 27. The existing abuse_accountability tag is not a fit, since the bill concerns drug trafficking rather than abuse of minors or abuse records, so the 'good' classification rests on the named harm, not that tag.
Theological note: Scripture grounds civil authority in restraining wickedness and protecting the vulnerable (Romans 13:3-4), and the trafficking of lethal drugs that kill neighbors bears directly on that duty. The procedural resolution is relevant only insofar as it advances a measure against fentanyl trafficking. Questions of proportionate punishment and due process in the underlying bill are issues for later review, not for this procedural vehicle.

## Recorded votes

Roll 30: On Ordering the Previous Question. Yea 212 · Nay 208 · Other 13.
Roll 31: On Agreeing to the Resolution. Yea 215 · Nay 208 · Other 10.

HTML: https://justmeasure.org/bill/hres-93-119/