# S.J.Res. 60 (119th): A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Emissions Budget and Allowance Allocations for Indiana Under the Revised Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Update".

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Emissions Budget and Allowance Allocations for Indiana Under the Revised Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Update".

## How this bill is scored

Tier: no Tier 1 record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Lane: air_pollution. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: environmental_policy. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: federal_state_authority. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Lane: regulatory_disapproval. Category: not stored. Lane tag: not stored.
Tier 1 sign-off: no record. A bill with no record cannot newly become Tier 1.
Stored polarity: mixed. Only tags the rules mark scoreable on a mixed bill are scored. A yea can draw a penalty or a credit according to the tag. A nay on a tag scored as good can draw a penalty.
Roll 520: On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 60. Vote type: cloture.
Polarity rationale: Reviewed enrichment (llm_import) polarity: The rule as described increases allowable NOx emissions, and disapproval would restrain that increase, which bears on neighbor health and stewardship. However, the dispute also involves prudential questions about regulatory design, compliance burdens, and federal-state allocation, and the metadata does not establish direct moral evil in the rule itself. A mixed classification fits this ordinary regulatory dispute better than a hard verdict.
Theological note: Scripture grounds human dominion in stewardship of creation rather than unchecked exploitation, and general equity asks whether a policy shifts air-quality burdens onto neighbors, including downwind communities. The issue is relevant to care for neighbor health and faithful stewardship, but the measure is primarily a prudential dispute over emissions limits, implementation, and federal-state authority.

## Recorded votes

Roll 520: On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 60. Yea 47 · Nay 51 · Other 2.

HTML: https://justmeasure.org/bill/sjres-60-119/