Bill

H.J.Res. 142 (119th): A joint resolution disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the D.C

A joint resolution disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the D.C. Income and Franchise Tax Conformity and Revision Temporary Amendment Act of 2025.

house · Substantive

Rankings updated October 26, 2026, 11:44 AM ET · Votes through September 30, 2026
Exported candidates: 719 | Filings on file, by office: H: 5838 | P: 1467 | S: 1567. These counts include every filing for that office, so they are larger than the ranked list. One person can have more than one filing. Non-voting delegates are left out.

Recorded summary

This joint resolution disapproves the D.C. Council's Income and Franchise Tax Conformity and Revision Temporary Amendment Act of 2025, nullifying its decoupling of D.C. tax law from federal provisions. D.C. normally adopts federal tax changes automatically (rolling conformity). Once the 2025 reconciliation act (the One Big Beautiful Bill Act) took effect, many of its tax provisions became D.C. law, and the D.C. legislation then decoupled from them. The resolution would restore D.C. alignment with those federal provisions, including a higher basic standard deduction, a larger charitable cash deduction for standard-deduction filers, a $6,000 deduction for taxpayers 65 and older, deductions for qualified tips, overtime pay, and car loan interest, a 100% elective depreciation allowance for nonresidential real property, and 100% deduction of research and experimental costs retroactive to tax year 2022. It would also negate the D.C. Council's separate restoration of the D.C. child tax credit.

congressional_reviewdc_governancefamily_policyfederalismtax_policy

Theological note: The measure concerns the ordering of tax policy between federal and D.C. authorities and the treatment of ordinary taxpayers, including families, seniors, workers, and charitable giving. Scripture supports just and honest public finance, care for the poor and the aged, and the proper bounds of civil authority, but the specific choice between conforming to federal tax rules and retaining local decoupling is a prudential question of governance. Its relevance lies mainly in equity to families and workers and in the proper limits of federal authority over a local jurisdiction, not in a direct moral act.

How this bill is scored

Recorded votes

Roll 56 · 4-Feb-2026 4:13 PM · On Passage · Passed

Yea 215 · Nay 210 · Other 7

Yea

Nay

Other

Roll 36 · February 11, 2026, 05:44 PM · On the Motion to Proceed H.J.Res. 142 · Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-46)

Yea 51 · Nay 46 · Other 3

Yea

Nay

Other

Roll 37 · February 12, 2026, 12:14 PM · On the Joint Resolution H.J.Res. 142 · Joint Resolution Passed (49-47)

Yea 49 · Nay 47 · Other 4

Yea

Nay

Other

All bills · Markdown