Bill

S.J.Res. 89 (119th): A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Buffalo Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".

senate · Procedural

Rankings updated October 26, 2026, 11:44 AM ET · Votes through September 30, 2026
Exported candidates: 719 | Filings on file, by office: H: 5838 | P: 1467 | S: 1567. These counts include every filing for that office, so they are larger than the ranked list. One person can have more than one filing. Non-voting delegates are left out.

Recorded summary

This joint resolution under the Congressional Review Act would nullify the Bureau of Land Management's November 20, 2024 amendment to the 2015 resource management plan for the Buffalo Field Office in Wyoming. That amendment made all BLM-managed coal resources in the planning area unavailable for future federal coal leasing. It was issued to comply with a court ruling requiring the BLM to evaluate the climate impacts of coal leasing under the National Environmental Policy Act, including alternatives that limit or stop leasing. If enacted, the resolution would bar the BLM from issuing a substantially similar rule and would require it to follow the 2015 plan, which makes coal available for leasing.

energy_policyenvironmental_regulationland_managementoversight

Theological note: This measure raises issues of stewardship of creation, under which land and mineral resources are to be developed and kept responsibly for the common good (Genesis 2:15). It also bears on provision for workers and communities that depend on energy production, and on prudent care for the land and for neighbors who may bear environmental risks. These considerations call for prudential weighing rather than a direct moral verdict on the resolution.

How this bill is scored

Recorded votes

Roll 621 · November 19, 2025, 02:23 PM · On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 89 · Motion to Proceed Agreed to (51-47)

Yea 51 · Nay 47 · Other 2

Yea

Nay

Other

All bills · Markdown